King's Gambit by Paul Hoffman was the best narrative chess book I've read. This book has tons of interesting stories about the game and the people who play it. From stories about how GMs try to prepare for games, to hustlers to crazy dictators - it has it all.
In a previous post, I copied a few excerpts about some violent antics by chess players ... these were typical stories from the book.
He also interjects his own story about he and his father - which for long stretches at a time, has nothing to do with chess, but nonetheless is a good read.
The one thing that struck me over and over again as I read, was how easily GMs seemingly blundered. There were at least half a dozen paragraphs where a GM was explaining the game ... he was ahead, the game was equal, but he made a strong move and would have sealed the win, except for an oversight or an outright blunder. I kept reading these passages over and over again and I couldn't help but think that blundering is just a part of chess. Professionals seemingly blunder on a regular basis! In fact, reading these passages seemed to void up my own resolve to keep at it. If these exceptional players screw up, then I shouldn't feel so bad about my shortcomings. Rather, I just need to keep at it - keep chugging along - to work at minimizing my own screw-ups. Everyone messes up.
Anyway - a great book - highly recommended.
Other Reviews of the Book
Review at ChessBase
Buy the book and read reviews at Amazon
Review at NYTimes
Review at ChessVille
Review at USCF
Monday, February 20, 2012
Wednesday, February 15, 2012
Game 13 of 52
About a week and a half ago, I played a former 45/45 Team League team mate. We've scheduled a 4 game series of 75/15 games over the next two months.
It was a pretty even game until the end. He had the advantage and was going to win, but made a bad move and subsequently resigned.
I've spent the last week or so reviewing the game. I gave a few positions to Fritz and those are annotated below as well.
Game 2 is coming up.
It was a pretty even game until the end. He had the advantage and was going to win, but made a bad move and subsequently resigned.
I've spent the last week or so reviewing the game. I gave a few positions to Fritz and those are annotated below as well.
Game 2 is coming up.
Labels:
52 Game Quest,
Let's Play
| Rate this post: |
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Happy V-Day
In honor of Valentine's Day, I'd like to share a passage from a book I'm reading. Chess is about passion and desire. And so when we lose, our emotions tend to spill over. Sometimes our love for the game turns to violence.
In Paul Hoffman's book The King's Gambit, he mentions some interesting tid-bits about other's desire for the game.
"Defeat in chess is always painful. William the Conqueror reportedly smashed a chessboard over the Prince of France. Pascal Charbonneau, the champion of Canada and my closest friend in the chess world, told me how a childhood contemporary broke all the furniture in a hotel room at a tournament and retired from chess. The Spanish writer Fernando Arrabal once signaled his resignation with a theatricality that surpassed Rossolimo's. He grabbed his king, climbed up on the chess table, extended his arm horizontally, and dropped the king so that it bombed the board.
"When I was a spectator in 2003 at the annual chess tournament at Foxwoods Casino, where 630 players were battling for a price fund of $93,500, I was nearly struck by a chess clock that an irate loser hurled in my direction. I'm sure I wasn't the intended target, but I had to duck, and the clock smashed into the wall behind my head and broke into pieces.
"When a player get violent, his wrath is often directed not at spectators or his opponent but at himself. One contemporary Russian grandmaster has been known to pick up the pointiest chess piece, usually the bishop or knight with a particularly jagged mane, and stab his own head until it bleeds. Then he rushes out of the tournament hall only to return for the next round as if nothing untoward has happened. At one event, this grandmaster was among the tournament leaders who were playing on an elevated stage. When he lost a key game, he bloodied his face and then, in an extreme masochistic flourish, dove off the three-foot high stage, belly-flopping onto the hard floor."
In Paul Hoffman's book The King's Gambit, he mentions some interesting tid-bits about other's desire for the game.
"Defeat in chess is always painful. William the Conqueror reportedly smashed a chessboard over the Prince of France. Pascal Charbonneau, the champion of Canada and my closest friend in the chess world, told me how a childhood contemporary broke all the furniture in a hotel room at a tournament and retired from chess. The Spanish writer Fernando Arrabal once signaled his resignation with a theatricality that surpassed Rossolimo's. He grabbed his king, climbed up on the chess table, extended his arm horizontally, and dropped the king so that it bombed the board.
"When I was a spectator in 2003 at the annual chess tournament at Foxwoods Casino, where 630 players were battling for a price fund of $93,500, I was nearly struck by a chess clock that an irate loser hurled in my direction. I'm sure I wasn't the intended target, but I had to duck, and the clock smashed into the wall behind my head and broke into pieces.
"When a player get violent, his wrath is often directed not at spectators or his opponent but at himself. One contemporary Russian grandmaster has been known to pick up the pointiest chess piece, usually the bishop or knight with a particularly jagged mane, and stab his own head until it bleeds. Then he rushes out of the tournament hall only to return for the next round as if nothing untoward has happened. At one event, this grandmaster was among the tournament leaders who were playing on an elevated stage. When he lost a key game, he bloodied his face and then, in an extreme masochistic flourish, dove off the three-foot high stage, belly-flopping onto the hard floor."
Labels:
Chess Violence
| Rate this post: |
Thursday, February 09, 2012
Happy Distraction = Good Ideas, Part 2
![]() |
| see link below about this book |
What caught my attention were a couple of paragraphs in the middle of the article.
"As a professional, Averbakh tried methodically to improve his game by exercising his subconscious mind, and intuition. 'It is very important to raise consciousness when you are working in chess,' he explains."
He then talks about how a relative of his wife told him to "examine Stanislavski's oeuvre" - whatever that means (more info at wikipedia?). He doesn't expound on what the system does, but in the next paragraph, it seems to allude to the 'happy distraction' idea.
He says, "For instance I was working on some ideas in endings ... I had one problem to solve and I couldn't find the solution. And when I was not working on this ... I was away somewhere, not over the chessboard, but immediately I found the solution, because my mind was working."
The article continues, "The gap between a strong grandmaster and a world championship candidate is partly a difference in the ability to attain peak performance during the game. Averbakh thinks this is about more than just study of positions, but it lies in the subconscious churning away while the player is, for instance, walking in a park or sitting in the theater watching a performance."
There is much more in the article and it is a really good read, but those few points really stood out while I was reading it.
The previous article to this one was about a new book out that is about Yuri (link here).
Labels:
Chess Improvement,
Creativity,
How to Think,
Learning
| Rate this post: |
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
Happy Distraction = Good Ideas
Since having read How We Decide, I've been checking out Jonah's blog over at Wired. Last week he posted "How Do We Identify Good Ideas?"
I think his post is highly applicable to chess. Josh Waitzkin also discussed a similar idea in his book Art of Learning.
In a nutshell ... if you need new ideas (creativity), do some brainstorming and then distract yourself for a bit before returning to the problem at hand. In chess-speak, when confronted with a critical problem or position, identify your candidate moves. Once you think you have the one you need, walk away and distract yourself - preferably by doing something that makes you happy. Then come back to the problem and reassess.
The distraction part allows your subconscious to take over and make connections. And when you let your subconscious work on the problem a bit, your chances of getting a better result go up.
I think his post is highly applicable to chess. Josh Waitzkin also discussed a similar idea in his book Art of Learning.
In a nutshell ... if you need new ideas (creativity), do some brainstorming and then distract yourself for a bit before returning to the problem at hand. In chess-speak, when confronted with a critical problem or position, identify your candidate moves. Once you think you have the one you need, walk away and distract yourself - preferably by doing something that makes you happy. Then come back to the problem and reassess.
The distraction part allows your subconscious to take over and make connections. And when you let your subconscious work on the problem a bit, your chances of getting a better result go up.
Labels:
Chess Improvement,
Creativity,
How to Think,
Learning,
Thinking Process
| Rate this post: |
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Ralph's Bigfoot Note
If you've been to Ralph's Lost in Chessland blog, have you ever scrolled all the way down? At the bottom of his blog, he has a footnote ... or rather a Bigfoot Note.
His Bigfoot Note is a summary of his training plan and things he needs to focus on. I think this is a great idea!
Labels:
Chess Blogging,
Training Plan
| Rate this post: |
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Annotated Game Collections
Another aspect of my chess study that I really need to ramp up is reviewing games by GMs and other top-notch players.
Heisman, in his February 2011 Novice Nook column, provides some insight for choosing books of game collections to study. I'd like to review Logical Chess Move by Move again and then move on to other books ... specifically the ones he recommends.
Heisman, in his February 2011 Novice Nook column, provides some insight for choosing books of game collections to study. I'd like to review Logical Chess Move by Move again and then move on to other books ... specifically the ones he recommends.
| Rate this post: |
Saturday, January 21, 2012
For those of you in Houston ...
As posted on Glenn Wilson's site (http://glennwilson.com/chess/) ... this event is to benefit Larry Englebretson
The Houston Songwriters Association (houstonsongwriters.com) and HoustonOpenMic.com will host a benefit event for Larry Englebretson Sunday, January 29th, 2012. All proceeds will be applied to Mr. Englebretson's short-term living expenses while he convalesces after a serious illness. Mr. Englebreston is an enthusiastic participant in the Houston open mic scene, as it's most frequent acapella performer. He is also the former owner of the Houston Chess Club and was selected as the United States' representative in the senior division of the 2011 World Chess Federation Championship.The event will be held at JP Hops House, 2317 S. Highway 6. Festivities begin at 3:00pm. Attendees will enjoy live bands, a bake sale, silent auction, and chess demonstrations by members of the Houston Chess Club. A prize will be awarded for "best of show" in the bake sale.The silent auction features a wide variety of items to suit any budget. Early donations include musical instruments, music instruction, studio recording services, and an impressive assortment of decorative and miscellaneous items of good value. The silent auction concludes at 7:00pm.Those who cannot attend are encouraged to make online donations at www.houstonopenmic.com/larry.html. A 3rd party donation will be made for every YouTube view of Larry's music video.
The latest news on his condition is posted at the Houston Chess Club under "Coach Larry Updates." Thanks,
The Houston Songwriters Association (houstonsongwriters.com) and HoustonOpenMic.com will host a benefit event for Larry Englebretson Sunday, January 29th, 2012. All proceeds will be applied to Mr. Englebretson's short-term living expenses while he convalesces after a serious illness. Mr. Englebreston is an enthusiastic participant in the Houston open mic scene, as it's most frequent acapella performer. He is also the former owner of the Houston Chess Club and was selected as the United States' representative in the senior division of the 2011 World Chess Federation Championship.The event will be held at JP Hops House, 2317 S. Highway 6. Festivities begin at 3:00pm. Attendees will enjoy live bands, a bake sale, silent auction, and chess demonstrations by members of the Houston Chess Club. A prize will be awarded for "best of show" in the bake sale.The silent auction features a wide variety of items to suit any budget. Early donations include musical instruments, music instruction, studio recording services, and an impressive assortment of decorative and miscellaneous items of good value. The silent auction concludes at 7:00pm.Those who cannot attend are encouraged to make online donations at www.houstonopenmic.com/larry.html. A 3rd party donation will be made for every YouTube view of Larry's music video.
The latest news on his condition is posted at the Houston Chess Club under "Coach Larry Updates." Thanks,
| Rate this post: |
Friday, January 20, 2012
Review of Bobby Fischer Against the World
I watched this haunting documentary last night. There really weren't any shocking revelations in the movie; nothing new that I hadn't heard of before. What was 'new' for me or unique about this documentary was seeing all the old pictures and film footage of Bobby. Other than that, I came away from it with just two thoughts.
The first one was the stark contrast of the Individual versus the Machine. The film did a fantastic job of showing this juggernaut that Soviet chess was. These guys dominated and they did it collectively and mechanically.
On the other end of the spectrum was this boy ... all by himself ... who without much, if any, family support and encouragement, single-handedly took on the Soviets and defeated them. That is a fascinating story line. And it would have been even more amazing had it not been for his delusions, which leads me to the second thought.
His life was so sad. His mom seemed like a kook. All he did was play chess - nothing else. He didn't have any real friends. When he was detained in Japan, he called his body guard from Iceland. He hadn't talked to him since 1972! He had no one else to phone. I don't know how things were in 1972, but did chess players, who got to that level, have a manager or something? But even if there were managers or handlers at that time, I'm not sure that even if he had one, that person could have helped Bobby much. I also wonder how much legal drugs could have helped him. What could have been ...
If you get the chance to watch it, you won't be disappointed.
The first one was the stark contrast of the Individual versus the Machine. The film did a fantastic job of showing this juggernaut that Soviet chess was. These guys dominated and they did it collectively and mechanically.
On the other end of the spectrum was this boy ... all by himself ... who without much, if any, family support and encouragement, single-handedly took on the Soviets and defeated them. That is a fascinating story line. And it would have been even more amazing had it not been for his delusions, which leads me to the second thought.
His life was so sad. His mom seemed like a kook. All he did was play chess - nothing else. He didn't have any real friends. When he was detained in Japan, he called his body guard from Iceland. He hadn't talked to him since 1972! He had no one else to phone. I don't know how things were in 1972, but did chess players, who got to that level, have a manager or something? But even if there were managers or handlers at that time, I'm not sure that even if he had one, that person could have helped Bobby much. I also wonder how much legal drugs could have helped him. What could have been ...
If you get the chance to watch it, you won't be disappointed.
Labels:
Bobby Fischer
| Rate this post: |
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Stop SOPA & PIPA
There is no doubt in my mind that these are harmful and dangerous proposals.
For my part, I wanted to share a few links so that you can be more informed and take action to stop this act of Congress.
For lots of information about what SOPA and PIPA would and could do as well as more broad information about this push to protect certain interests, read techdirt. techdirt also links to another site to take action: stopthewall.us.
Google has also created a petition to stop these acts. Click here to sign the petition.
Drudge is also running a link to the NYTimes that has an article explaining the protest today.
Another blog I regularly read is by Seth Roberts. More than anything else I've read (except techdirt), this post by Seth Roberts explains perfectly what this whole issue is all about.
Labels:
Free Speech
| Rate this post: |
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
On this date ... Bobby Fischer
Bobby Fischer died 4 years ago today.
While performing some searching today, I found that the DVD for the HBO documentary Bobby Fischer Against the World was released last month. I've heard nothing but good reviews of it. I plan to watch it later this week and then I'll post some thoughts on it.
While performing some searching today, I found that the DVD for the HBO documentary Bobby Fischer Against the World was released last month. I've heard nothing but good reviews of it. I plan to watch it later this week and then I'll post some thoughts on it.
Labels:
Bobby Fischer,
Movies
| Rate this post: |
Game 12 of 52
Feeling pretty confident off my recent win against Trudy, I quickly moved on to the next opponent "above" Trudy in the ladder - Seb.
The dreaded Seb. I'm 0-2 against him. In the last two games, I seemed to start off ok, only to be tripped up and promptly mated. The third time was no charm; I'm 0-3 now against him.
What surprises me is that Trudy seemed so easy to beat. But Seb seems to go into high gear when the game gets heated and then he just puts the smack-down on me. It seems that I wouldn't so easily lose to Seb when I so easily won against Trudy.
After a little analysis, I found there were at least a few moves that I should have considered a bit more.
The first position was this one. He had just taken my night with 13...cxe5.
I played dxe5 ... opening the diagonal between his queen and my king. I don't know if 14. Bxe5 is any better. In fact, I'm not too sure this is even that critical of a position. But I struggled a bit with this one.
After my actual move dxe5, he played 14...Bh4 and I responded 15. Qe2. Next he attacked my bishop with 15...g5 16. Be3 Qe6 17. Bd4 a6 18. f3.
18. f3 may be another move that I should have considered a bit more. In stead, perhaps 18. h3 would be a bit better. He may have played 18...Nh6 and the pressure would have been relieved a bit. But I played f3 and he ended up taking h2. I took his knight with my king, he advanced 19...g4 20. fxg4 and then he played Qh6 and that was pretty much it.
I blundered big time at this point, but upon further examination, I really had no choices whatsoever. I still fail to see anyway to stop his attack.
So I played Be3, he played Bg5+ 22. Kg3 Qh4+ 23. Kf3 Bxg4#. The game was over.
I don't think I was playing my best chess when I started this game. The first hour or so, I was pretty focused, but then I had to pause the game several time when the kids came home from school and we had dinner and other family events going on. I'd like to try Seb again when I have a full 3 uninterrupted hours against him. I'm not giving excuses ... I think Seb is a difficult player for me and I don't think I'll ever so easily beat him. But I'd like a crack at him with full concentration.
After the G/90 game, I played him a G/10. And this is where I had the thought that he goes in to "high gear" when the game is on the line. I was soundly beating him; and then he had about 2 minutes on his clock and then he started making killer moves. Anyway - I need to crack this nut.
Finally - just a quick update on Chess Tempo ... I've managed to stay above 1700 for a full week now. Although, just today, when I did my 20 tactics, I was served several tactics that were well over 1700 and a few over 1800. I choked on them big time. I started off the session over 1730 and ended the session at 1704. Things just weren't clicking today. So the slide back down has begun.
The dreaded Seb. I'm 0-2 against him. In the last two games, I seemed to start off ok, only to be tripped up and promptly mated. The third time was no charm; I'm 0-3 now against him.
What surprises me is that Trudy seemed so easy to beat. But Seb seems to go into high gear when the game gets heated and then he just puts the smack-down on me. It seems that I wouldn't so easily lose to Seb when I so easily won against Trudy.
After a little analysis, I found there were at least a few moves that I should have considered a bit more.
The first position was this one. He had just taken my night with 13...cxe5.
I played dxe5 ... opening the diagonal between his queen and my king. I don't know if 14. Bxe5 is any better. In fact, I'm not too sure this is even that critical of a position. But I struggled a bit with this one.
After my actual move dxe5, he played 14...Bh4 and I responded 15. Qe2. Next he attacked my bishop with 15...g5 16. Be3 Qe6 17. Bd4 a6 18. f3.
18. f3 may be another move that I should have considered a bit more. In stead, perhaps 18. h3 would be a bit better. He may have played 18...Nh6 and the pressure would have been relieved a bit. But I played f3 and he ended up taking h2. I took his knight with my king, he advanced 19...g4 20. fxg4 and then he played Qh6 and that was pretty much it.
I blundered big time at this point, but upon further examination, I really had no choices whatsoever. I still fail to see anyway to stop his attack.
So I played Be3, he played Bg5+ 22. Kg3 Qh4+ 23. Kf3 Bxg4#. The game was over.
I don't think I was playing my best chess when I started this game. The first hour or so, I was pretty focused, but then I had to pause the game several time when the kids came home from school and we had dinner and other family events going on. I'd like to try Seb again when I have a full 3 uninterrupted hours against him. I'm not giving excuses ... I think Seb is a difficult player for me and I don't think I'll ever so easily beat him. But I'd like a crack at him with full concentration.
After the G/90 game, I played him a G/10. And this is where I had the thought that he goes in to "high gear" when the game is on the line. I was soundly beating him; and then he had about 2 minutes on his clock and then he started making killer moves. Anyway - I need to crack this nut.
Finally - just a quick update on Chess Tempo ... I've managed to stay above 1700 for a full week now. Although, just today, when I did my 20 tactics, I was served several tactics that were well over 1700 and a few over 1800. I choked on them big time. I started off the session over 1730 and ended the session at 1704. Things just weren't clicking today. So the slide back down has begun.
Labels:
52 Game Quest,
Chessmaster,
ChessTempo
| Rate this post: |
Friday, January 13, 2012
Game 11 of 52
It was another shellacking of a Chessmaster (Grandmaster edition) opponent. Today I played the "Trudy" personality. Trudy is rated 1290 and I was rated 1082 going into the game. We played a G/90.
When I've played these personalities before, I'd kind of go up in the game, only to later fall into some trap and lose. I've learned to play slow; take my time; and calculate - which is the whole purpose of this 52 game quest. Trudy dropped 4 pawns before she began to fight. But by then, I forced her to trade queens and then eventually went up with 2 rooks and a bishop against two bishops and a rook. I pushed my pawns, queened, exchanged some more and then pulled off the checkmate.
I expect the competition will get stiffer as I move up the ladder in Chessmaster.
Just a real quick accounting update ... before this game, I had played 3 games vs. a Chessmaster opponent. Then I played 5 games in the US Class Championships. Over the Thanksgiving break, I played a couple of other Chessmaster personalities, but I don't remember who. I think I won one of them and lost the other. So with this game, I've now played 11 and have 41 more to go before August. I'm hoping to be more consistent with keeping up on the status of this 52-game quest.
As always, my readers and observers are always welcome to play me a G/90 or G/120 on FICS or in person. Just leave a comment and we can work out a date and time.
When I've played these personalities before, I'd kind of go up in the game, only to later fall into some trap and lose. I've learned to play slow; take my time; and calculate - which is the whole purpose of this 52 game quest. Trudy dropped 4 pawns before she began to fight. But by then, I forced her to trade queens and then eventually went up with 2 rooks and a bishop against two bishops and a rook. I pushed my pawns, queened, exchanged some more and then pulled off the checkmate.
I expect the competition will get stiffer as I move up the ladder in Chessmaster.
Just a real quick accounting update ... before this game, I had played 3 games vs. a Chessmaster opponent. Then I played 5 games in the US Class Championships. Over the Thanksgiving break, I played a couple of other Chessmaster personalities, but I don't remember who. I think I won one of them and lost the other. So with this game, I've now played 11 and have 41 more to go before August. I'm hoping to be more consistent with keeping up on the status of this 52-game quest.
As always, my readers and observers are always welcome to play me a G/90 or G/120 on FICS or in person. Just leave a comment and we can work out a date and time.
Labels:
52 Game Quest,
Chessmaster
| Rate this post: |
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Red-Letter Day
My geometry teacher would often called exceptionally good days "red-letter-days." Today was a red-letter-day for me. In fact, it may become the an official RockyRook holiday - to be celebrated from today hence-forth!
After over 17,700 blitz attempts on ChessTempo, for the first time, I crossed the 1700 threshold. Ok ... I may have crossed it a long, long time ago at some point when my rating deviation was fluctuating like bull-rider, but in recent memory and for as long as I've been consistently solving tactics, I've never crossed this threshold. I've come oh-so-close before ... flirting with it while getting into the 1690's, but I'd always plummet back down to 1660 or lower.
But today ... I smashed through! In fact, last week at this time, after I had done my daily 20 problems, I was sitting at 1645. Then I went on some kind of rampage busting all the way up to 1687 by Sunday. Monday January 9 was a busy day and I didn't have time at night since we went to a BCS party (way to go Alabama!!) So today, I had to do my 20 for yesterday plus my 20 for today. I went 36-4 and broke through that glass ceiling and then managed to stay above 1700 for a few problems. After tonight's session, I'm sitting at 1705.
The lucky problem was number 55162.
*UPDATE*
So I got a little curious ... it just seemed to me that this couldn't have been my first time over 1700 (actively speaking) ... and so I bought a Gold Membership to see the full history (I had bought a membership before, but I had let it expire ... I figured it was time to pay up again anyway ... I really love the site). Sure enough, I was over 1700 a few times. In fact, the most recent time was just last year ... around the May/June time period. That must have been several hundred problems ago.
Oh well ... so I get a little enthusiastic about my rating ...
Let's see if I can maintain it above 1700 a bit longer this time.
After over 17,700 blitz attempts on ChessTempo, for the first time, I crossed the 1700 threshold. Ok ... I may have crossed it a long, long time ago at some point when my rating deviation was fluctuating like bull-rider, but in recent memory and for as long as I've been consistently solving tactics, I've never crossed this threshold. I've come oh-so-close before ... flirting with it while getting into the 1690's, but I'd always plummet back down to 1660 or lower.
But today ... I smashed through! In fact, last week at this time, after I had done my daily 20 problems, I was sitting at 1645. Then I went on some kind of rampage busting all the way up to 1687 by Sunday. Monday January 9 was a busy day and I didn't have time at night since we went to a BCS party (way to go Alabama!!) So today, I had to do my 20 for yesterday plus my 20 for today. I went 36-4 and broke through that glass ceiling and then managed to stay above 1700 for a few problems. After tonight's session, I'm sitting at 1705.
The lucky problem was number 55162.
*UPDATE*
So I got a little curious ... it just seemed to me that this couldn't have been my first time over 1700 (actively speaking) ... and so I bought a Gold Membership to see the full history (I had bought a membership before, but I had let it expire ... I figured it was time to pay up again anyway ... I really love the site). Sure enough, I was over 1700 a few times. In fact, the most recent time was just last year ... around the May/June time period. That must have been several hundred problems ago.
Oh well ... so I get a little enthusiastic about my rating ...
Let's see if I can maintain it above 1700 a bit longer this time.
Labels:
ChessTempo,
Red-Letter-Days,
Tactics
| Rate this post: |
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
How We Decide by Jonah Lehrer
So I'm on a bit of a intellectual-reading kick this month. After summarizing what I learned from Waitzkin's book, I picked up Jonah Lehrer's book. This one has been on my to-read list for a couple of years now. Since it fit so well with Waitzkin's book, I moved it up in the queue and dove into it a little over a week ago.
This book was a really good read with lots of fascinating stories and experiments - all of which were highly stimulating.
I'd love to re-cap all the stories and main points, but there is just so much and all the chapters are inter-connected to make one big point. So instead of doing a full-recap, I'd rather advise you to go to the library, check this book out and then read it. There is a lot to chew on and a lot of little things you can learn from this book.
But the main thing to learn from this book is that we need to use both our emotions and our reasoning to make decisions. Sometimes our emotions - our gut feelings - do a better job at deciding, while other times, we should let our reasoning do the steering in order to make the best decision. He has a really good summary chapter at the end and explains when to use our gut feelings and when to use our reasoning.
Another major point that had major overlap with Waitzkin's book, dealt with when to use our emotions. If, we've done the "perfect practice" and have refined our area of expertise with many years questioning about how we've could have done better, then we would best be suited to use our "gut feelings." Waitzkin talked about this in his book. Lehrer also cited quite a few people - from professional backgammon players to quarterbacks to professional poker players - who practiced, practiced and practiced until they were "dreaming it" Then, and only then, could they begin to rely on instinct.
On the flip side, our instincts will fail us when we are presented with random situations. The recounting of the 1980 NBA team the 76ers and the study of the "hot hand" was truly fascinating. The "hot hand" statistically does not exist. Our minds are fixed to look for patterns, but when patterns truly do not exist, and our minds are think there is a pattern, then our instincts are worthless. So, we've got to know when to rely on our gut feelings and we also have to know when to not rely on them and instead, rely on our reasoning.
The story of the veteran smokejumper who was confronted with certain death was amazing. The smokejumpers were dropped into a fire, but the conditions changed in a heart-beat and suddenly they were being chased by a wildfire. They began running from the flames, but one smokejumper overcame his instincts to run and instead stopped and thought creatively. He lit a fire! He purposely burned a fire and then hunkered down while the wildfire passed over him. He was one of a few who survived and his creative technique is now common practice for smokejumpers. The other similar story was of the pilots of Flight 232 who miraculously crash landed the plane - they too were confronted with a new scenario. They emotions bought them some time to reason their way out of the pinch
But now we flip back. Sometimes emotion helps, other times it hurts us (the smokejumpers who didn't survive). Reason is good when confronted with a new situation ... but what if we get trapped into paralysis by analysis? Or what if we choke? This sometimes occurs when we are very proficient at something, but then we begin to over-think it. When we should be on auto-pilot, our unwanted deliberate thoughts begin to interfere with our performance - we literally choke and fail. When confronted with over-think, we should recognize it and then begin to train with cue words. Again, when we've gained proficiency, we need to let our "auto-pilot" take control. If our micro-manager sneaks in, we need to kick him out. We can train our minds to think in broad strokes rather than the micro.
Lehrer also gets into it a bit about the moral mind. That was also an intriguing chapter about what makes us human - the ability to think about how others feel and thus act accordingly.
Lastly - he puts it all together by giving tips on when to use emotion versus when to use reasoning.
When expertness has been reached, gut feelings are the way to go
SIMPLE PROBLEMS REQUIRE REASON
NOVEL PROBLEMS ALSO REQUIRE REASON
EMBRACE UNCERTAINTY
YOU KNOW MORE THAN YOU KNOW and
THINK ABOUT THINKING.
On that last point, he says, "if you're going to take only one idea from this book, take this one: Whenever you make a decision, be aware of the kind of decision you are making and the kind of thought process it requires. The best way to make sure that you are using your brain properly is to study your brain at work, to listen to the argument in your head"
And consider this passage ... "Of course, even the most attentive and self-aware minds will still make mistakes. Tom Brady, after the perfect season of 2008, played poorly in the Super Bowl. Michael Binger, after a long and successful day of poker, always ends up regretting one of his bets. The most accurate political experts in Tetlock's study still made plenty of inaccurate predictions. But the best decision-makers don't despair. Instead, they become students of error, determined to learn from what went wrong. They think about what they could have done differently so that the next time their neurons will know what to do. This is the most astonishing thing about the human brain: it can always improve itself. Tomorrow, we can make better decisions."
This book was a really good read with lots of fascinating stories and experiments - all of which were highly stimulating.
I'd love to re-cap all the stories and main points, but there is just so much and all the chapters are inter-connected to make one big point. So instead of doing a full-recap, I'd rather advise you to go to the library, check this book out and then read it. There is a lot to chew on and a lot of little things you can learn from this book.
But the main thing to learn from this book is that we need to use both our emotions and our reasoning to make decisions. Sometimes our emotions - our gut feelings - do a better job at deciding, while other times, we should let our reasoning do the steering in order to make the best decision. He has a really good summary chapter at the end and explains when to use our gut feelings and when to use our reasoning.
Another major point that had major overlap with Waitzkin's book, dealt with when to use our emotions. If, we've done the "perfect practice" and have refined our area of expertise with many years questioning about how we've could have done better, then we would best be suited to use our "gut feelings." Waitzkin talked about this in his book. Lehrer also cited quite a few people - from professional backgammon players to quarterbacks to professional poker players - who practiced, practiced and practiced until they were "dreaming it" Then, and only then, could they begin to rely on instinct.
On the flip side, our instincts will fail us when we are presented with random situations. The recounting of the 1980 NBA team the 76ers and the study of the "hot hand" was truly fascinating. The "hot hand" statistically does not exist. Our minds are fixed to look for patterns, but when patterns truly do not exist, and our minds are think there is a pattern, then our instincts are worthless. So, we've got to know when to rely on our gut feelings and we also have to know when to not rely on them and instead, rely on our reasoning.
The story of the veteran smokejumper who was confronted with certain death was amazing. The smokejumpers were dropped into a fire, but the conditions changed in a heart-beat and suddenly they were being chased by a wildfire. They began running from the flames, but one smokejumper overcame his instincts to run and instead stopped and thought creatively. He lit a fire! He purposely burned a fire and then hunkered down while the wildfire passed over him. He was one of a few who survived and his creative technique is now common practice for smokejumpers. The other similar story was of the pilots of Flight 232 who miraculously crash landed the plane - they too were confronted with a new scenario. They emotions bought them some time to reason their way out of the pinch
But now we flip back. Sometimes emotion helps, other times it hurts us (the smokejumpers who didn't survive). Reason is good when confronted with a new situation ... but what if we get trapped into paralysis by analysis? Or what if we choke? This sometimes occurs when we are very proficient at something, but then we begin to over-think it. When we should be on auto-pilot, our unwanted deliberate thoughts begin to interfere with our performance - we literally choke and fail. When confronted with over-think, we should recognize it and then begin to train with cue words. Again, when we've gained proficiency, we need to let our "auto-pilot" take control. If our micro-manager sneaks in, we need to kick him out. We can train our minds to think in broad strokes rather than the micro.
Lehrer also gets into it a bit about the moral mind. That was also an intriguing chapter about what makes us human - the ability to think about how others feel and thus act accordingly.
Lastly - he puts it all together by giving tips on when to use emotion versus when to use reasoning.
When expertness has been reached, gut feelings are the way to go
SIMPLE PROBLEMS REQUIRE REASON
NOVEL PROBLEMS ALSO REQUIRE REASON
EMBRACE UNCERTAINTY
YOU KNOW MORE THAN YOU KNOW and
THINK ABOUT THINKING.
On that last point, he says, "if you're going to take only one idea from this book, take this one: Whenever you make a decision, be aware of the kind of decision you are making and the kind of thought process it requires. The best way to make sure that you are using your brain properly is to study your brain at work, to listen to the argument in your head"
And consider this passage ... "Of course, even the most attentive and self-aware minds will still make mistakes. Tom Brady, after the perfect season of 2008, played poorly in the Super Bowl. Michael Binger, after a long and successful day of poker, always ends up regretting one of his bets. The most accurate political experts in Tetlock's study still made plenty of inaccurate predictions. But the best decision-makers don't despair. Instead, they become students of error, determined to learn from what went wrong. They think about what they could have done differently so that the next time their neurons will know what to do. This is the most astonishing thing about the human brain: it can always improve itself. Tomorrow, we can make better decisions."
Labels:
Chess Improvement,
Expertise,
Instinct,
Learning
| Rate this post: |
Sunday, December 18, 2011
The Art of Learning by Josh Waitzkin
I finished reading The Art of Learning several days ago and then for the last few days, I've been re-reading several passages; highlighting parts I thought stood out.
The first eight chapters were fascinating from a chess perspective. Those first chapters read more like a biography, but there are a few smatterings of key points he uses to connect back into the main topic of the book.
Chapter 9 introduces his stepping into the world of Tai Chi - and this is where the real meat of the book begins. I've marked several passages in the second half of the book and I'll note those below.
I think a lot of these lessons are very applicable to chess. They are applicable to pretty much anything in life. I found value in many of these passages as I think about applying them to my performance in my career.
But if you are interested in this "softer" side of learning, then I highly recommend the book. And what I mean by 'softer' is that, everything he discusses is built on the premise that you must become proficient and even expert in the technical aspects of your performance (chess, career, sports, etc.) Once you have put in the learning and practice, then these other, softer, aspects will help you perform better.
Michael Jordan - He made a point about Michael Jordan, in the chapter "Investment in Loss." He states that MJ made more last-second shots than any other player in NBA history. MJ also missed more last-second shots than anyone else in NBA history! I think the point is well-taken, but since then, there has been another player who has taken and missed more shots than MJ - Kobe Bryant. According to this analysis, MJ is 9/18 on last-second shots while Kobe is 6/23.
But again, the point is still valid. To succeed, you have to take risks - you have to risk loss to become great - this was the essence of chapter 10.
Circles - A lot of this book was de ja vu - in that I've heard this before. He references Pirsig in his Zen book about this girl who sets out to attempt to write a 500 word essay on her town. She thinks there is nothing to write about - experiences writer's block. So Phaedrus asks her to begin describing the opera house - brick by brick. She thinks it won't work, but then she begins and a "torrent of creativity" floods her mind and the block is removed. He then makes a point (back to the premise his book is built on) that excellence is built on depth over breadth - that you must dive into the micro to understand the macro.
In chess-speak - to get really good at blitz, you must play a lot of long, slow games. To get good at tactics, you must understand tactics - begin small/slow and being working up. We've all heard of The Circles - that is why many of us bloggers started blogging - to achieve that Don de la Maza experience!
To quote Waitzkin, "We have to be able to do something slowly before we can have any hope of doing it correctly with speed."
In describing a pattern in Tai Chi, he says, "Over time, I'm not thinking about the path from foot to fist, I'm just feeling the ground connecting my fingertips, as if my body is a conduit for the electrical impulse of a punch."
Using Adversity- He mentions three steps, when learning to deal with adversity. I thought they were worth capturing.
1) "we have to learn to be at peace with imperfection"
2) "in our performance training, we learn to use that imperfection to our advantage - for example thinking to the beat of the music or using a shaking world as a catalyst for insight."
3) "learn to create ripples in our consciousness, little jolts to spur us along, so we are constantly inspired whether or not external conditions are inspiring."
Slowing Down Time- Earlier in the book, he mentioned breaking his hand in a competition. At that moment, time slowed down and he was able to move "Neo-like" and defeat his opponent, despite the broken hand. He talks about this experience repeatedly - and you can understand why he wants to break down the mechanics of "slowing down time." Who wouldn't want to slow down time?
Going back to the premise - much of what he discusses in this chapter absolutely depends on your proficiency. He even dips into the "chunking" we've all heard discussed. For my own sake (and if you understand it, your benefit too) I've documented those parts that build a recipe for slowing down time.
"I realized I had to delve into the operating mechanism of intuition."
"My numbers to leave numbers approach to chess study was my way of having a working relationship with the unconscious parts of my mind." Note - his numbers to leave numbers as far as I understood, means getting technically proficient/expert in order to become creative.
"In my opinion, intuition is our most valuable compass in this world. It is the bridge between the unconscious and the conscious mind, and it is hugely important to keep in touch with what makes it tick."
He then gets into chunking ... I won't get into his quotes on this.
So, now that your mind is "chunked", "this is where things get interesting. We are at the moment when psychology begins to transcend technique. Everyone at a high level has a huge amount of chess understanding, and much of what separates the great from the very good is deep presence, relaxation of the conscious mind, which allows the unconscious to flow unhindered."
"The idea is to shift the primary role from the conscious to the unconscious without blissing out and losing the precision the conscious can provide."
So, once you have the knowledge and the chunking, then you can begin to practice relaxing to the point that your unconscious can handle all the peripheral data, so your conscious can intensely focus on the critical data.
If you can practice this, then you can slow down time!
The Illusion of the Mystical - To be honest, I didn't quite 'get' this chapter. To me, it read more like "how to figure out the tells of a poker player." I didn't see a whole lot of use of this chapter.
Immunity - In "The Power of Presence" chapter, he wrote something I thought was powerful. It was simply another way of stating the premise of the book - that you must master the technical aspects of your profession in order to use much of what he discusses in the book. He said, "Grandmasters know how to make the subtlest cracks decisive. The only thing to do was become immune to the pain, embrace it, until I could work through hours of mind-numbing complexities as if I were taking a lovely walk in the park."
On the following page, I basically highlighted the whole thing. It touches a lot on "perfect practice" and making your practice feel "real" so that when the real deal does come, you are prepared to act under no pressure - because you've already been there.
"In every discipline, the ability to be clearheaded, present, cool under fire is much of what separates the best from the mediocre. In competition, the dynamic is often painfully transparent. If one player is serenely present while the other is being ripped apart by internal issues, the outcome is already clear. The prey is no longer objective, makes compounding mistakes, and the predator moves in for the kill. While more subtle, this issue is perhaps even more critical in solitary pursuits such as writing, painting, scholarly thinking, or learning. In the absence of continue external reinforcement, we must be our own monitor, and quality of presence is often the best gauge. We cannot expect to touch excellence if 'going through the motions' is the norm for our lives. On the other hand, if deep, fluid presence becomes second nature, then life, art, and learning take on a richness that will continually surprise and delight. Those who excel are those who maximize each moment's creative potential - for these masters of living, presence to the day-to-day learning process is akin to that purity of focus others dream of achieving in rare climatic moments when everything is on the line."
"The secret is that everything is always on the line. The more present we are at practice, the more present we will be in competition, in the boardroom, at the exam, the operating table, the big stage. If we have any hope of attaining excellence, let alone of showing what we've got under pressure, we have to be prepared by a lifestyle of reinforcement. Presence must be like breathing."
Searching for the Zone - He then gets into how we can build our own trigger of getting into that constant state of presence. In a nutshell - it is High Intensity Internal Training - otherwise known as HIIT. For those of you unfamiliar with HIIT - go google it and get to know it. If you're lazy, then I'll just say that HIIT means exercising at high intensity for a small amount of time and then recovering and then repeating the high intensity and then recovering ... repeated several times. A HIIT workout typically lasts 20-30 minutes and is generally known to be the secret to burning fat.
Waitzkin sees it as a way of building that bridge between conscious and unconscious; as a way to always be present. He analyzed his chess games and found that his best thinking occurred in spurts of 10 minute 'moves.' When he was not "present" he found that he spent much longer thinking and that his decisions were not great at all. So he learned that he could improve his thinking process by monitoring how he felt - how efficient he was thinking. If he started to 'falter' then he would take a break - go do some sprints (HIIT), return, cool off with water to the face and then look at the position anew.
"If you are interested in really improving as a performer, I would suggest incorporating the rhythm of stress and recovery into all aspects of your life. Truth be told, this is what my entire approach to learning is based on - breaking down the artificial barriers between our diverse life experiences so all moments become enriched by a sense of interconnectedness." He then mentions that meditation - a few minutes a day - in which your mind gathers and releases with the ebb and flow of breathing.
In the following chapter, Building Your Trigger - he also discusses other ways to get into that zone. In essence, you find what makes you feel relaxed - so that when it is time to perform, you can quickly gather your presence and then perform well.
Once you identify what makes you feel focused - in the zone - present (whatever you want to call it), you then associate music, routines or anything else that you want to do to get you in the zone. You can start off with a 20-30 minute routine, and then you slowly begin to whittle it down to minutes. Then, if you are called to perform unexpectedly, it will only take you minutes or seconds to get in the zone.
He mentions a man he worked with to build his trigger. He felt most relaxed when playing catch with his son. So he set up a routine:
1) Eat a light consistent snack for 10 minutes
2) 15 minutes of meditation
3) 10 minutes of stretching
4) 10 minutes of listen to his music
5) Play catch
He set up this routine and followed it for a month. Then he transported it to the day of his big performance - it worked!
Next he began cutting out playing catch and did 1-4 ... and slowly began working his way down doing minutes of meditation until finally he was able to get into the zone with just a few minutes of meditation - and it would have the same effect.
The rest of the book brings much of the previous chapters together. The last few discuss how he used all that he had learned to become world champion in push hands. Again, that part was more biography, but still fascinating to read about.
So, I know this was a long post - but there were so many intriguing parts to it, I felt I needed to capture what stood out to me. I actually do this with almost all the books I read, but since this one crosses over into my "chess world" I decided to post my review on this blog.
Anyway - I recommend the book - I found some use out of it and I'm thinking about what I can do to incorporate what I learned into my life - both chess-wise and career-wise.
The first eight chapters were fascinating from a chess perspective. Those first chapters read more like a biography, but there are a few smatterings of key points he uses to connect back into the main topic of the book.
Chapter 9 introduces his stepping into the world of Tai Chi - and this is where the real meat of the book begins. I've marked several passages in the second half of the book and I'll note those below.
I think a lot of these lessons are very applicable to chess. They are applicable to pretty much anything in life. I found value in many of these passages as I think about applying them to my performance in my career.
But if you are interested in this "softer" side of learning, then I highly recommend the book. And what I mean by 'softer' is that, everything he discusses is built on the premise that you must become proficient and even expert in the technical aspects of your performance (chess, career, sports, etc.) Once you have put in the learning and practice, then these other, softer, aspects will help you perform better.
Michael Jordan - He made a point about Michael Jordan, in the chapter "Investment in Loss." He states that MJ made more last-second shots than any other player in NBA history. MJ also missed more last-second shots than anyone else in NBA history! I think the point is well-taken, but since then, there has been another player who has taken and missed more shots than MJ - Kobe Bryant. According to this analysis, MJ is 9/18 on last-second shots while Kobe is 6/23.
But again, the point is still valid. To succeed, you have to take risks - you have to risk loss to become great - this was the essence of chapter 10.
Circles - A lot of this book was de ja vu - in that I've heard this before. He references Pirsig in his Zen book about this girl who sets out to attempt to write a 500 word essay on her town. She thinks there is nothing to write about - experiences writer's block. So Phaedrus asks her to begin describing the opera house - brick by brick. She thinks it won't work, but then she begins and a "torrent of creativity" floods her mind and the block is removed. He then makes a point (back to the premise his book is built on) that excellence is built on depth over breadth - that you must dive into the micro to understand the macro.
In chess-speak - to get really good at blitz, you must play a lot of long, slow games. To get good at tactics, you must understand tactics - begin small/slow and being working up. We've all heard of The Circles - that is why many of us bloggers started blogging - to achieve that Don de la Maza experience!
To quote Waitzkin, "We have to be able to do something slowly before we can have any hope of doing it correctly with speed."
In describing a pattern in Tai Chi, he says, "Over time, I'm not thinking about the path from foot to fist, I'm just feeling the ground connecting my fingertips, as if my body is a conduit for the electrical impulse of a punch."
Using Adversity- He mentions three steps, when learning to deal with adversity. I thought they were worth capturing.
1) "we have to learn to be at peace with imperfection"
2) "in our performance training, we learn to use that imperfection to our advantage - for example thinking to the beat of the music or using a shaking world as a catalyst for insight."
3) "learn to create ripples in our consciousness, little jolts to spur us along, so we are constantly inspired whether or not external conditions are inspiring."
Slowing Down Time- Earlier in the book, he mentioned breaking his hand in a competition. At that moment, time slowed down and he was able to move "Neo-like" and defeat his opponent, despite the broken hand. He talks about this experience repeatedly - and you can understand why he wants to break down the mechanics of "slowing down time." Who wouldn't want to slow down time?
Going back to the premise - much of what he discusses in this chapter absolutely depends on your proficiency. He even dips into the "chunking" we've all heard discussed. For my own sake (and if you understand it, your benefit too) I've documented those parts that build a recipe for slowing down time.
"I realized I had to delve into the operating mechanism of intuition."
"My numbers to leave numbers approach to chess study was my way of having a working relationship with the unconscious parts of my mind." Note - his numbers to leave numbers as far as I understood, means getting technically proficient/expert in order to become creative.
"In my opinion, intuition is our most valuable compass in this world. It is the bridge between the unconscious and the conscious mind, and it is hugely important to keep in touch with what makes it tick."
He then gets into chunking ... I won't get into his quotes on this.
So, now that your mind is "chunked", "this is where things get interesting. We are at the moment when psychology begins to transcend technique. Everyone at a high level has a huge amount of chess understanding, and much of what separates the great from the very good is deep presence, relaxation of the conscious mind, which allows the unconscious to flow unhindered."
"The idea is to shift the primary role from the conscious to the unconscious without blissing out and losing the precision the conscious can provide."
So, once you have the knowledge and the chunking, then you can begin to practice relaxing to the point that your unconscious can handle all the peripheral data, so your conscious can intensely focus on the critical data.
If you can practice this, then you can slow down time!
The Illusion of the Mystical - To be honest, I didn't quite 'get' this chapter. To me, it read more like "how to figure out the tells of a poker player." I didn't see a whole lot of use of this chapter.
Immunity - In "The Power of Presence" chapter, he wrote something I thought was powerful. It was simply another way of stating the premise of the book - that you must master the technical aspects of your profession in order to use much of what he discusses in the book. He said, "Grandmasters know how to make the subtlest cracks decisive. The only thing to do was become immune to the pain, embrace it, until I could work through hours of mind-numbing complexities as if I were taking a lovely walk in the park."
On the following page, I basically highlighted the whole thing. It touches a lot on "perfect practice" and making your practice feel "real" so that when the real deal does come, you are prepared to act under no pressure - because you've already been there.
"In every discipline, the ability to be clearheaded, present, cool under fire is much of what separates the best from the mediocre. In competition, the dynamic is often painfully transparent. If one player is serenely present while the other is being ripped apart by internal issues, the outcome is already clear. The prey is no longer objective, makes compounding mistakes, and the predator moves in for the kill. While more subtle, this issue is perhaps even more critical in solitary pursuits such as writing, painting, scholarly thinking, or learning. In the absence of continue external reinforcement, we must be our own monitor, and quality of presence is often the best gauge. We cannot expect to touch excellence if 'going through the motions' is the norm for our lives. On the other hand, if deep, fluid presence becomes second nature, then life, art, and learning take on a richness that will continually surprise and delight. Those who excel are those who maximize each moment's creative potential - for these masters of living, presence to the day-to-day learning process is akin to that purity of focus others dream of achieving in rare climatic moments when everything is on the line."
"The secret is that everything is always on the line. The more present we are at practice, the more present we will be in competition, in the boardroom, at the exam, the operating table, the big stage. If we have any hope of attaining excellence, let alone of showing what we've got under pressure, we have to be prepared by a lifestyle of reinforcement. Presence must be like breathing."
Searching for the Zone - He then gets into how we can build our own trigger of getting into that constant state of presence. In a nutshell - it is High Intensity Internal Training - otherwise known as HIIT. For those of you unfamiliar with HIIT - go google it and get to know it. If you're lazy, then I'll just say that HIIT means exercising at high intensity for a small amount of time and then recovering and then repeating the high intensity and then recovering ... repeated several times. A HIIT workout typically lasts 20-30 minutes and is generally known to be the secret to burning fat.
Waitzkin sees it as a way of building that bridge between conscious and unconscious; as a way to always be present. He analyzed his chess games and found that his best thinking occurred in spurts of 10 minute 'moves.' When he was not "present" he found that he spent much longer thinking and that his decisions were not great at all. So he learned that he could improve his thinking process by monitoring how he felt - how efficient he was thinking. If he started to 'falter' then he would take a break - go do some sprints (HIIT), return, cool off with water to the face and then look at the position anew.
"If you are interested in really improving as a performer, I would suggest incorporating the rhythm of stress and recovery into all aspects of your life. Truth be told, this is what my entire approach to learning is based on - breaking down the artificial barriers between our diverse life experiences so all moments become enriched by a sense of interconnectedness." He then mentions that meditation - a few minutes a day - in which your mind gathers and releases with the ebb and flow of breathing.
In the following chapter, Building Your Trigger - he also discusses other ways to get into that zone. In essence, you find what makes you feel relaxed - so that when it is time to perform, you can quickly gather your presence and then perform well.
Once you identify what makes you feel focused - in the zone - present (whatever you want to call it), you then associate music, routines or anything else that you want to do to get you in the zone. You can start off with a 20-30 minute routine, and then you slowly begin to whittle it down to minutes. Then, if you are called to perform unexpectedly, it will only take you minutes or seconds to get in the zone.
He mentions a man he worked with to build his trigger. He felt most relaxed when playing catch with his son. So he set up a routine:
1) Eat a light consistent snack for 10 minutes
2) 15 minutes of meditation
3) 10 minutes of stretching
4) 10 minutes of listen to his music
5) Play catch
He set up this routine and followed it for a month. Then he transported it to the day of his big performance - it worked!
Next he began cutting out playing catch and did 1-4 ... and slowly began working his way down doing minutes of meditation until finally he was able to get into the zone with just a few minutes of meditation - and it would have the same effect.
The rest of the book brings much of the previous chapters together. The last few discuss how he used all that he had learned to become world champion in push hands. Again, that part was more biography, but still fascinating to read about.
So, I know this was a long post - but there were so many intriguing parts to it, I felt I needed to capture what stood out to me. I actually do this with almost all the books I read, but since this one crosses over into my "chess world" I decided to post my review on this blog.
Anyway - I recommend the book - I found some use out of it and I'm thinking about what I can do to incorporate what I learned into my life - both chess-wise and career-wise.
Labels:
Expertise,
Learning,
Psychology
| Rate this post: |
Sunday, October 23, 2011
Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev
I have finally completed reading Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev.
This little project of mine has been going on years and it finally came to an end on the evening of Friday October 21, 2011. I can't recall when I received my copy of the book ... it must have been around 2003 as a Christmas present. I wanted it, because, back then, it was the book to have if you were aspiring to improve your chess.
At about this same time, I heard about the Polgar Brick and the subsequently how a few old Chessville denizens worked on that "project". I missed out on the project and therefore was reduced to scouring the Internet for that .pgn file.
So to tie these two thoughts together - when I received my copy of Logical Chess, I decided to make a "project" out of it. I would work on it game by game - page by page. Sometimes I would spend a lot of time on one game, other times I would blow through a game fairly quickly. Then there came a time when I abandoned it altogether ... only to just pick up the book and read over the games, but not work on the project.
Then the desire came back ... I just had to finish it. Granted, it may not be perfect, but in my opinion this book is one of those timeless books and it felt better to have it all in one file.
My future plans for this book include additional review. I've done some of the variations, but not all of them. As I have more time to really dive into the games, I'll add the variations. But for now, it is in a form I've always wanted it in.
Enjoy.
This little project of mine has been going on years and it finally came to an end on the evening of Friday October 21, 2011. I can't recall when I received my copy of the book ... it must have been around 2003 as a Christmas present. I wanted it, because, back then, it was the book to have if you were aspiring to improve your chess.
At about this same time, I heard about the Polgar Brick and the subsequently how a few old Chessville denizens worked on that "project". I missed out on the project and therefore was reduced to scouring the Internet for that .pgn file.
So to tie these two thoughts together - when I received my copy of Logical Chess, I decided to make a "project" out of it. I would work on it game by game - page by page. Sometimes I would spend a lot of time on one game, other times I would blow through a game fairly quickly. Then there came a time when I abandoned it altogether ... only to just pick up the book and read over the games, but not work on the project.
Then the desire came back ... I just had to finish it. Granted, it may not be perfect, but in my opinion this book is one of those timeless books and it felt better to have it all in one file.
My future plans for this book include additional review. I've done some of the variations, but not all of them. As I have more time to really dive into the games, I'll add the variations. But for now, it is in a form I've always wanted it in.
Enjoy.
Labels:
Books,
Logical Chess Move by Move
| Rate this post: |
Wednesday, October 05, 2011
Rules for Entering Class Divisions in a USCF Tournament
This question if for all you USCF TDs and frequent tournament players.
So while I was registering for the US Class Championships this year, I entered into the Class C division because my rating was 1434P and the Class C division showed ratings from 1400 to 1599. But after the tournament, I noticed that there were three players, going into the tournament, who had a rating higher than 1599 (see note below).
Why could these three players enter a class division from 1400-1599 when they had a rating higher than 1599?
Note: the three players had ratings of 1639, 1690 & 1702, so a couple of players were around 100 points higher than the upper limit of the Class C.
So while I was registering for the US Class Championships this year, I entered into the Class C division because my rating was 1434P and the Class C division showed ratings from 1400 to 1599. But after the tournament, I noticed that there were three players, going into the tournament, who had a rating higher than 1599 (see note below).
Why could these three players enter a class division from 1400-1599 when they had a rating higher than 1599?
Note: the three players had ratings of 1639, 1690 & 1702, so a couple of players were around 100 points higher than the upper limit of the Class C.
Labels:
USCF
| Rate this post: |
Monday, October 03, 2011
US Class Championships 2011

Friday September 30, 2011
After a long day of work, I drove down to Hobby Airport at the Hilton. A cold front finally moved through South Texas and the weather was perfect in every sense of the word. It was a great night to watch a football game and look at the stars. But I had other things on my mind - the Class C section. Round 1 for the 3-day was that night.
Like last year, the accommodations were nice. The Friday night round was quiet as usual as only about half show up while the other half prefer to start round 1 on Saturday morning.
Round 1
The G/120 game started at 8:00pm. For me, it lasted well past midnight. I played an older gentleman who was a little late for the start. I started the clock and then he showed up a few minutes later.
I didn't get off to a great start and was quite rusty. My pawn structure was all awry and he took full advantage of it. I went down a pawn very early. Later in the game, he left a pawn en prise and I returned the favor by not taking it (smack to the head!). After I made my move, I realized I should have taken the pawn. Then my whits really started failing me. I held on for a few more moves only to commit an outright blunder by leaving my rook undefended. I immediately resigned. He was very cordial and reviewed the game with me for the next 45 minutes. In the course of talking to him, it was apparent he had a lot of knowledge of the game. He said he was retired and that was all he does anymore - study and play chess for several hours each day. He seemed like the person that might win the Class C tournament.
Saturday October 1, 2011
Round 2
I tried to get some sleep after that tough loss. I didn't get much. I woke the next day, went on a walk in the crisp morning air, returned, mowed the lawn and then watched some football on TV. I headed back to Hobby around noon to start round 2 at 1:00pm.
![]() |
| White pushed back |
We traded a few pieces, he attacked, then I counterattacked and then be blundered. He thought he could check me and capture my rook, but he failed to see that my queen was defending h8. But by this time, my clock was down to two minutes. So I quickly promoted and mated him.
Round 3
After I won my first game, I got away from the place and ate some dinner - a nice sirloin steak - and watched some more football and baseball. I went back to Hobby feeling pretty good.
![]() |
| 27...Bxe3?? |
So I went home Saturday night with two wins under my belt! I didn't feel deserving of both of them, but I took them all the same.
Sunday October 2, 2011
Round 4
I drove to Hobby again feeling anxious. My unspoken goal was to get three wins, and I wanted to win round 4 and then still have round 5 for a shot at earning some prize money.
![]() |
| Queen stuffed in the corner |
Round 5
I cannot lie - I was feeling really good. The only way I can describe it is how Harry Potter must have felt after taking that "feel-lucky" potion. I just felt I could do no wrong. My confidence was to the point of brewing over - border-lining on genuine hubris! I failed to mention earlier, that I was the lower-rated player in all these games coming in at 1434.
![]() |
| 28. e7 and Black resigns |
I had about an hour left on my clock and he had over an hour left on his - it was a "quick" game both by time elapsed and moves.
![]() |
| The people in Black and Gold were the Saints fans |
Finally the games in Class C finished and they put up the final results. I came in "4th" and scored $150! I checked the tournament results tonight and my rating went from 1434 to 1617! Indeed, it was a great weekend.
Labels:
52 Game Quest,
OTB,
USCF
| Rate this post: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






















